夏雨天空

摘要：这是一幅让所有中国人永远过目不忘的油画，它展现了1937年日军在南京屠城的暴行。整幅油画由“屠”、“生”、“佛”三联组成，宽3.2米、高2.1米，画面主体是堆积成山的尸体。左侧为“屠”：两个趾高气扬的日本军官站立着，其中一个正狞笑着擦拭沾满鲜血的战刀。中间一联为“生”：在尸山的上面，一个孩子正趴在裸露着胸膛惨死了的母亲身上哭喊着。右侧一联为“佛”：一位佛家弟子正拖起一位惨死的老人。整座尸山的后面是奔流滚滚的长江。 这幅油画在海外巡展时曾引起巨大轰动，常常见到西方的观众在画前默默伫立，久久不愿离去，许多人都泪流满面。值得一提的是也有人对展览的成功感到不舒服。一些日本人也来参观。他们走后不久，就有人打电话来，要求主办者撤下《南京大屠杀》。随后，主办方又接到了××大使馆打来的电话，再次提出撤画的请求。愿我们在拭去泪水之后，都能记住这张油画，记住这段血写的历史　查看全文

摘要：摘 要 本文采用计量经济学线性回归的计量方法，以凯恩斯主义消费模型、两时期模型、 持久收入模型和生命周期理论为依据，分析了家庭平均可支配收入、物价水平、利率等因 素对影响我国城市居民的消费的影响。结果表明，我国居民的消费决策受到跨时期预算约 束的影响，前期消费水平、家庭平均可支配收入和物价水平对消费有很好的预测能力，但 是消费受利率的影响不明显。本文得到的回归模型能够很好的预测家庭的消费水平。 关键字 家庭消费模型 凯恩斯消费理论 两时期模型 持久收入模型 生命周期理论　查看全文

摘要：自从和女朋友一起看了梁祝后，就非常喜欢蝴蝶，也因此喜欢上了这首歌。这个flash的图片非常漂亮，歌也好听。以此献给亲爱的maggie和世界上所有的有情人。　查看全文

摘要：This is the last piece of my work on Doing English Digital.Though with many challenges, this course benefit me a lot. I would like to thank my Professor, Miss Zhang and my dear classmates. Thank you for your help. Good afternoon, respected Professor Zhang and my dear classmate, thank you for your attendance to my presentation. My topic is the “intelligence determined by nature or nurture?”　查看全文

摘要：在北大校园BBS引起轰动的一篇文章 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 　　我生长在东北的哈尔滨，虽然从小唱着"大刀向鬼子的头砍去……"，听着历史老师很愤恨的叫日本人"倭寇"、"鬼子"，看着诸如731部队之类的报道和展览，但这并不影响我儿时对日本的看法，记得小的时候，同学录上"最向往的地方"一栏，我填的都是日本。 　　那个时候觉得日本的动画片很好看，日本的小电器好用，甚至连日本的忍者和剑道高手，都是我心中的偶像。小时候拿着木棍模仿日本人劈剑的经历，我现在都记忆犹新。渐渐的，人也长大了。有机会听到见到更多关于日本的东西。这中间当然有那段不短的历史，有日本国内对中国的看法，有日本经济的强大，和时常能听到的"友好邻邦一衣带水"之类的宣传。 　　 来自：http://www.onlydv.com/2005/txt.htm 中国人，特别是哈日的，该醒醒了！和平不是一厢情愿，只有自己的强大才能得到别人的尊重。　查看全文

摘要：意向性科学与科技发展的新方向 作者： 刘钢 | 2004年09月27日20时16分 | 已阅 4230 次 当我们回顾科学技术在20世纪的发展历程就可以清楚看到，存在着两条进路：一条是以物理学为代表的；而另一条则是以意向性科学（intentional sciences）为主导的。尤其是上个世纪后半叶以来，意向性科学的发展呈加速状态。 什么是意向性科学？ 最早提出意向性科学的人似乎是美国计算机科学家史密斯（Brian Cantwell Smith）。他在一部名为《论物体的起源》首次使用了这个词。这是个哲学术语，所谓意向性（intentionality）就是关旨性（aboutness），　查看全文

摘要：网络英语课结束了 本站以后也许将会较少的贴英语的文章了 将会更多的关注生活、关注健康、关注科学。先贴一张关于饮食的 大家以后吃东西时一定要注意哦· 二十种不能混吃的食物 1. 猪肉*菱角-------肚子痛 2. 牛肉*栗子-------引起呕吐 3. 羊肉*西瓜-------伤元气　查看全文

After Seven day's hard work, I have eventually finished my draft paper. Though a little bit tired, the accomplishment of an English essay gives me a sense achievement

and the enjoyment of writing.

[The article is available at http://blogfile0.tom.com/file/4/2/4/f_225242_9678.rar or you can visit billbillbill32003.blog.tom.com to download it ]

Please give me any suggestons.  Your advice will be  appreciated. Thank you .

This map is the structure of my essay, hope it can represent my idea of nature and nurture.

1. Introduction:
         Nature or nurture--- which is stronger?
Nature is fate, a kind of predestination, while nurture is education, a kind of struggle.
The answer to the debate of "nature or nurture" matters a lot in every aspects of our life, such as in education, elections and judgments et al. So the determination of psychological traits by nature or nurture requires full scientific investigation and research. Among these traits, intelligence is of the most importance for our first concern about education of election is the ability or IQ score of the candidates.
2．Body
2.1 Thesis Statement：
       The determination of intelligence is the interaction of nature with nurture. Talent or dull is not caused exclusively by either environment or genes.
2.2 Main points:
Part One:        A review of the classical study
(1)    Twins Study:
The Twins Study carried out mainly in the Centre of Minnesota reveals that nature, or gene, plays a vital role in the determination of intelligence, approximately 70 percent   of talent can be traced back to gene.
(2)     Family Study:
Although the compeers of the family shares a pool of gene, the IQ score of the family changes a lot from generation to generation. The cause of the increase in IQ score may be attributed to the improvement in the environment of upbringing, which supports the assertion of the nurture determinism.
(3)     Adoption Study
The comparison between the brothers or the sisters who are adopted by a upper class family with their compartment show a great increase in the intelligence for the adopted children, which add support to the importance of nurture.
(4)     Animal Study
Animal study shows a great difference in problem solving ability in rats, and to some extent, the ability cannot be changed by training, which again favors the view of nature determination.
Part Two: pros and cons of these studies----in a comparison approach
All the studies catch a glimpse of the debate of "nature or nurture", but they are far from perfect.
(1)    Twins Study:
Our attempt to control the influence of environment will only result in vain. But without a rigid control of nurture, we can not attribute the difference in intelligence to the cause of nature
(2)   Family Study:
It is not practical for the scientists to trace the change in intelligence of one family from generation to generation, so the family study provides no more than an empirical analysis of the debate of "nature or nurture" and its result can never be treated as scientific conclusion.
(3)     Adoption Study
There is not always an opportunity for the scientist to carry out such a research, so the result of adoption study can hardly be checked.
(4)     Animal Study
The animal study is well-known for it is very       simple and practical to carry out, but human and animal differs so whether the conclusion of the animal study can be applied to human beings needs further investigation.
3      Conclusions:
Psychological traits, especially intelligence, depend very much upon experience, or nurture; on the other hand, intelligence exhibits a high degree of the influence of nature.
We can simply conclude it in such a way:
"What we can do is set by the nature, but what we actually do is largely determined by the nurture"